Chapter 10 was very dense. While all the concepts introduced
make sense, there’s a lot to them. Chapter 10 focuses on externalities, which
are the external benefits and/or cost to society a market will have, in the big
picture, but is also the uncompensated impact on one person’s actions on the
well-being of a bystander. A negative externality means that the bystander pays
for the impact (e.g. pollution caused by big factories) and a positive externality
means the bystander benefits from the impact (e.g. education creates
well-educated neighbors and societal advances). In dealing with both positive
and negative externalities, the government can take an active role to reduce
the negative or enhance the positive externalities through subsidies or
regulation and corrective taxes. For regulations, I wonder whether price
ceilings and floors would either fall under it or correlate, or because they do
not deal with externalities directly they are considered completely separate? While
I understand that corrective taxes are better, in that case, would those taxes
still create a deadweight, or would the shrinkage of the market be considered
only beneficial to society and therefore not be considered? And with tradable permits,
does the idea only fall under pollution, or would other substances be
considered for allowing permits? Also trading permits is still a hazy idea to
be just because of my more liberal views, but in either case, could this
eventually lead to a decline in the amount of pollution or would it probably
just stay capped at its max allowed amount?
No comments:
Post a Comment